Bad Science! Go Sit in the Corner
Posted by spritzophrenia on October 15, 2010
One of the problems with reporting early results from science is that sometimes… they’re wrong! Just a few days ago I reported on the discovery of a possibly Earth-like planet.
|
Now New Scientist reports it might not exist. Thanks to Atheist Climber for alerting me to this.
|
Planet Earth |
That’s science for ya folks. No doubt over the next few years we’ll discover what is really going on out there. Probably those mean aliens are using their superior technologiez to hide themselves from us.
Either way, it’s probably inevitable a similar discovery will be made one day. And it doesn’t change my original question:
If we found alien life, would that be a problem for world religions? I know one group of weirdos who’ll be pleased— the Alien Sex Cult I reported on.
Respond
? What do you think?
Please subscribe (top left)
Speaking of aliens, check out the new romantics in this: Duran Duran | Planet Earth
|
|

God And Alien Life « Spritzophrenia said
[...] Bad Science! Go Sit in the Corner [...]
dogcicle said
I’ve been waiting for 2 days for the mother-ships arrival predicted for 10-13,14-2010 ….and all i got so far are a few UFOs in NYC, Malaysia, China and England..i’m very disappointed
spritzophrenia said
Hey, swing by and pick me up if the ships arrive? Thanks Dogcicle
Socratica said
It’s exciting that you posted on this. God bless scientists (irony intended), but sometimes they get it wrong. Just like with religious leaders, we’d all be so much better off if they could admit when they made a boo boo and, who knows, maybe even laugh it up.
I know some religious persons who wouldn’t have any problem at all with life in other places in the universe. I also know some who would sooner believe that they were living in the Matrix than succumb to such heresy. I think sometimes we agnostics stereotype “Christians,” “Buddhists,” “Muslims,” etc. horribly incorrectly, just as they sometimes do to us. The safest bet is simply to walk up to an actual person and ask, “So what do you think?”
spritzophrenia said
Yeah, Socratia, I believe that being able to see and happily admit when you’re wrong is really important.
I guess science has that built-in self correcting thing, it’s part of the mechanism of good science to find mistakes and change.
I agree too about labels – “Buddhist”, “Agnostic” etc are only useful so far. It’s why I try to interview actual people here about their beliefs too, eg Freeman http://spritzophrenia.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/interview-with-a-modern-pagan/
thanks for stopping by